Thursday, October 19, 2006

Twenty-six ways I'm making the universe a more sensible place

There's this book all the hipsters are talking about, titled 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die. Curiously, the list (which is available online) does not include the book in which the list appears. The meta-ness of this gives me a headache, so I try not to think about it. Actually, I try not to think much at all. Life's easier when you spend less time thinking and more time knowing. Confrontation is for the weak-minded. Self-assurance is where it's at.

So when the book hit earlier this year I dismissed it because I don't need any people telling me what's good for my brain. I am my own man. My own dog. The tree barks up me. No doubt: I do what I want.

Still, Jessa Crispin got everyone talking about the book again, and people are comparing their scores like high schoolers on SAT day, and lest you think I'm an intellectual party pooper denying you assurance of my well-grounded authority on the subject of literature, I printed up a copy of the list and did my thing. Instead of checking off the books I had read, though, I figured it would be easier to cross off the books I hadn't read. Because surely no list could be a match for my superfluous prowess, right?

Four dead markers and one sore hand later, I ran the sheets through the Cray, went to stick a couple pairs of my smarty pants in the washer, then came back just as the computer spat back the final number: 900. I've read 900 of the listed books. At the risk of being modest: I rule.

Like you were in doubt.

Then I noticed that the second zero was actually a coffee splotch. 90? I've only read 90 of the listed books? What the deuce? That's not even 10 percent! That's terrible.

At this point I could only ask myself one of two questions:
  1. What am I doing with all my time?
  2. Man, how totally crap is this list?
Naturally, I chose the path of truth and light. It's true: I set the list alight. With a match.

Then I set my considerable intellect to the task of theorizing a universe in which it's possible to construct such a list from which I'd read less than 10 percent of the suggested books; pretending, for a moment, that that universe is the universe in which I truly live, then, it's only possible to conclude that the list we've been given is flawed, broken, because surely I'd get past 10 percent, even in the deepest, darkest theoretical breaches of reality. With that in mind, I've set about the almost Colbertian task of fixing the list so as to better reflect the nature of our beloved Wikiality. I present the results of my studied labors below.

For those of you keeping score at home, this marks another win for me, and another loss for the forces of darkness and evil. And please, hold your applause until the final name is called.

Thirteen books that I've read that were obviously somehow accidentally (if not perversely) left off the "1,001 books" list:



  1. Interstate, Stephen Dixon. Duh.

  2. Europe Central, William Vollmann. Duh. Seriously, no Vollmann anywhere on the list? Who thought it was a good idea to slight the crack-smoking gun-shooting maniac? Don't worry, Papa Billy: Bloggers got your back. You keep firing, we'll keep loading. Our posts. With paeans. To you.

  3. Look at Me, Jennifer Egan. Uhm, yeah. Duh.

  4. The Gunslinger, Stephen King. Yeah, that's right: I'm going there.

  5. Vurt, Jeff Noon. I've read it like eight times, but I'll be nice and I'll only count it once.

  6. Because They Wanted To, Mary Gaitskill. Because I want to.

  7. Paradise Lost, John Milton. Yeah, hello, it's only the single greatest epic poem ever written. Plus it makes Satan look totally awesome. It's like the world's first heavy metal album. Parents, keep this one locked up and away from your kids. You thought Grand Theft Auto had them acting bad? Wait until this one gets them casting themselves out of heaven. Just saying, there's no such thing as a hell-proof parachute.

  8. American Gods, Neil Gaiman. It's not even that I'm a big fan of Gaiman's stuff, I mean I like him well enough and all, but what's really got me worried is his fan base, which is, to say the least, moderately hardcore. If they find out that Gaiman didn't make the list, they'll unleash some serious voodoo all up on this world, and I am so not going down with that ship.

  9. Dhalgren, Samuel R. Delany. Sure, James Joyce invented the circular narrative. But Delany perfected it. Plus Dhalgren, unlike Joyce's little experiment in stark raving madness, is written in real English, a language spoken by 100 percent of the people who know what I'm sayin'.

  10. The Chocolate War, Robert Cormier. Everybody loves candy. Mmm. Candy.

  11. Aurora Leigh, Elizabeth Barrett Browning. EBB? She ain't no hollaback girl.

  12. Snow, Orhan Pamuk. Say it with me, Dorothy: "There's no bell like a Nobel..."

  13. The Poky Little Puppy. Because everyone's gotta crawl before they become totally awesome like me.


Thirteen books that somehow made it on the "1,001 books" list that I have not read that will have to be erased from existence to make room for the thirteen books that I have read:



  1. The Old Man and the Sea, Ernest Hemingway. It's short. Nobody will miss it.

  2. The Sea, John Banville. Maybe I'm still bitter that this guy beat Kazuo Ishiguro for the Booker last year, but come on, man, you wrote a book about water? Congratulations, big guy, that's only been done before and better by every single poet of the Romantic era. What are you going to do for a sequel? The Sea, Part II: Heavens Me, There's a Lot of Water Out There?

  3. Don Quixote, Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra. Sure, it was the first novel ever written, but come on, it's not like there haven't been some huge advances in novel writing technology since then. Is your computer still running Windows 3.1? No. So would you run your brain on Novel: The Beta Version? I think not.

  4. Smilla's Sense of Snow, Peter Høeg. I don't like snow, and my list has only got room for one book about snow, and this one ain't it.

  5. Finnegans Wake, James Joyce. Please. Not even the people who sit by themselves at the Elitist Bastards Convention can pretend they've read this one with straight faces.

  6. Whatever, Michel Houellebecq. What, whatever? What? Look, pal, if you can't be bothered to come up with a title for your book, I sure as hell can't be bothered to read it. At least Banville bothered to slap a real label on his book, making it that much easier for me to decide not to read it. What. Whatever. Whatever yourself, buddy.

  7. Glamorama, Bret Easton Ellis. There's three of Ellis's books on this list, and only one of Stephen King's books. What kind of happy crappy were the listmakers smoking? Anyway, I'm just evening the score.

  8. If Not Now, When?, Primo Levi. Good question. How about never?

  9. The Recognitions, William Gaddis. I've got enough gigantic modern novels sitting on my bookshelf, staring at me with sad puppy dog eyes, trying every moment of every day to guilt me into reading them immediately. Guess what: I don't need another one. You can talk this one up all you want, people. I'm not buying it. No way. No sir. No how.

  10. Confessions, Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Here's a confession: I've never read any all of any book from the 1700s section of this list. Here's another confession: I don't feel bad about that. Seriously, Restoration & 18th Century literature was crap. Let me summarize all of it for you: "Blah BLAH blah BLAH blah BLAH blah BLAH da DUM/Blah BLAH blah BLAH blah BLAH blah BLAH da PUM." Repeat ad infinitum. Congratulations, you can now ignore that entire era.

  11. Mason & Dixon, Thomas Pynchon. I've read The Crying of Lot 49. I've read V. just recently. And I really do plan on reading Gravity's Rainbow sooner rather than later. Isn't that enough Pynchon for one life? Yes, in fact, that is enough Pynchon for one life. Heck, maybe even three or four lives. When I die and my undead soul returns to wander the lands of the living for an age and eternity, I'll let you know for sure.

  12. Saturday, Ian McEwan. Saturday, as we all know, is the best day of the week. So why, then, did it give rise to the dullest book ever? I'm zapping this one just so I can rid myself of the memory of what portion of the book I did read. Blech.

  13. Correction, Thomas Bernhard. Good idea. Corrected!

10 comments:

Cath said...

I concur - just what the hell have I been doing until now - since I clearly have not read the "important" works of fiction*. I was truly surpised by how many I hadn't read - I know I am not well-read (when compared to someone god-like) - but, there were an awful lot of things missing. Kit Marlowe anyone? Shakespeare while we are at it. Bohumil Hrabal's wonderful "Too Loud a Solitude". Works by Tim Winton. All of us could think of something that moved us and is absent from the list. So do I make some sort of stand and read what I like? Or do I bow to pressure and feel like I should make some headway on this list?


*Allegedly important.

Arethusa said...

when my eyes hit "The Curious Dog Murderer in Twilight " I couldn't take the list seriously. And I love "The Sea" by John Banville, but surely a better book by...anyone else could have replaced "The Shroud"?

I'm in the 90's and I don't want to go any further.

Norm said...

I feel motivated to let you know that I read every word you post here even though I don't comment much if at all.

My motivation extends to the point of saying, at the risk of looking silly, that you are so right about Pynchon. Gravity's Rainbow was enough Pynchon for one lifetime, for me.

Anonymous said...

I want someone who's pretending to be a duck to leave comments at my site. How does DDIII do it? What marketer does the legwork for this site?

I'll leave a real comment later.

Maureen McHugh said...

You gotta put Smilla's Sense of Snow back on the list. Smilla is my favorite Superhero. I'm sure that there is something else you can throw off the list, I mean, Snow really should be on it. But dude. Smilla's Sense of Snow is FUN. (The same cannot be said for Snow. It is a lot of things, but I can't say it is exactly Fun.)

Darby M. Dixon III said...

Cath: Yeah, way I see it, any list is always going to be incomplete. They make fun guides, though. And good convo fodder. I say, perhaps obviously: Make your stand!

Arethusa: Yeah, for as much as I've heard of the Dog Incident book, it's never occurred to me to actually read it. And I find it hard to seriously respect the list for having so many authors on there five times. Except, of course, for Ishiguro, who should have been there for all six of his books, not just five of them...but that's just me.

Norm: You probably shouldn't admit to reading me so much. They send people to mental hospitals for less crazy stunts.

Matt: I'll have my publicist talk to your publicist. Your publicist speaks mallard, right?

McQ: See, the only reason Smilla jumped off the list at me was because I remember seeing the trailer for the movie version a lot one movie season and I think I remember getting really bored with it. But if you say it doesn't suck, I'll speak to the review board and see what we can see...

Anonymous said...

It was disconcerting to see a list with so many repeated authors. As if readers might not construe that hey, this person might be worth reading more of. Strange to see Sputnik Sweetheart on there, but not Wind-Up Bird Chronicle by Murakami.. unless I somehow missed it.

Interstate so should've been on there.

mary grimm said...

Synchronistically, I had just read the 1001 list before I read your blog today. It brought a certain snarkiness: do I really have to read a James Bond book before I die? (OK, so I did read Casino Royale, but if I hadn't?)
It also made me think things like, 'you know, I think I've read enough Gide/Jack London/Rousseau etc. to last me for the rest of my life, so I won't be paging through The Counterfeiters any time soon.'
Who is JG Ballard? does he deserve to have so many books on the list?

Arethusa said...

Don't forget "Memoirs of a Geisha"! I'm sure there'll be a book & movie box set released some day.

Wind-Up Bird Chronicle was on it, fusis, I think. I'd also have put "Hardboiled Wonderland" before Sputnik but oh well. *shrugs* It's not as if much of the list makes sense. By the time you reach any period before the 1950's the guy just starts pulling out Wordsworth Classics.

Darby M. Dixon III said...

Fusis: Yeah, I sort of assume that writers who have managed to publish 5+ books, that when I like one of their books, there's a good chance it's worth immersing myself in the back catalogue. As in the case of such over-prolific authors as Dixon, this, of course, takes longer. So there's a list that might be fun to see: what's the One Book by such authors you should really read so you can at least get a taste of what they do? And/or, what's the one other book of theirs that isn't what received/perceived wisdom dictates as their best book? Or in any case it would have been nice for them to have limited this list to one book per author, so we'd have something else to argue over (I mean, discuss). Putting five out of six Ishiguro novels on there seems weird. One or none or all! (Etc etc etc, rant cut off here for length reasons.)

Lucette: I don't know my Ballard too well. The one title jumping to my mind is Crash, which I know I read part of once. Dark stuff, one of the many many many authors I know I should get to know better someday. As for James Bond--I at least like the (maybe not so subtle) point of the list, as it looks in the direction of Lit Elite, and it suggests/implies/demands that it is not just okay but necessary to read "popular" work in addition to The Hot New Lit Things Of The Week. Still, I haven't read any James Bond novels, and probably won't any time soon...

Arethusa: Yeah, I hear Geishaing is quite the romantic hobby these days.